Google Cloud Platform or Amazon Web Services: Which is Better?

We observe 3 major players in the cloud platform sphere: Microsoft Azure, Amazon Web Services (AWS), and Google Cloud Platform (GCP). Together, they occupy a huge portion of the market segment, provide the broadest range of helpful features, and are the most popular according to user opinion. If you are unsure about which cloud service provider to choose, this article will benefit you. We will provide a thorough review of the google cloud platform and amazon web services to determine their strong and weak points. We will also thoroughly compare Google and AWS so that users can select the most suitable one.

Google Cloud

Google Cloud

Google has managed this platform since 2011. Its main highlights are cloud computing resources, services. GC is developed with Google infrastructure, which is beneficial for organizations that employ it. Google compute engine provides a high-security level for information storage, flexibility, and various backup services. The engine allows broad network accessing and enhanced User Interface. With a market presence of 8%, it is the third most-used option.

Key features:

  • The volume size is 1 GB to 64 TB
  • Pricing per minute
  • Primary service – Google Compute Engine
  • Data transfer- fully encrypted
  • Data centers in 24 regions, 73 zones, 35 countries

Amazon Web

Amazon launched this platform in 2006. It’s an excellent option for developers looking for a provider who is hosting the most data centers. It also includes delivery, analytic, and networking support. Its market presence sits at an impressive 33%, making it the most widely used platform among enterprises.

Key features:

  • The volume size is 1 GB to 64 TB
  • Pricing per minute
  • Primary service – Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2)
  • Data transfer- general format
  • Data centers in 24 regions, 77 zones, and 245 countries

Why compare?

You may be wondering, “Why should we compare an absolute market leader and a relatively minor company?”. Let’s clarify this point first and then move on to the comparison stage. AWS currently beats GCP, but we don’t know how the situation will turn out in the future. Besides, they are both considered among the best Django hosting services providers. AWS has certain disadvantages, just as GCP has its benefits, which may play a crucial role in future market development. We will determine all the strong and weak points of the two leading service providers to show which one is the best to select, taking into account the particular demands of businesses. We don’t insist on picking Google Cloud Platform or AWS. We just want to demonstrate for what purposes they are ideal or not suitable.

Google Cloud Platform or Amazon Web Services: Which one is better for 2021?

There isn’t a universal solution available. GCP and AWS are competitors, yet their characteristics aren’t completely identical. The first stage is to specify the pluses and minuses of these two competitive service suppliers. Then we suggest a comparison of Google vs. AWS for various needs. 

Google Cloud Platform: Pros and Cons

Among the pros of Google Cloud, we can mention:

  • offers high performance via fast innovation accessing;
  • involves a highly developed infrastructure;
  • open-source, highly portable platform;
  • enables connecting with cloud services via a serverless environment;
  • employs tools for data analyzing;
  • efficient, flexible pricing and long-term reduced prices;
  • products for Big Data and Machine Learning;
  • multiple customization solutions;
  • industry-leading tools in AI (TPU) which support various libraries;
  • provides instant payment configurations.

Its disadvantages include:

  • some difficulties while starting;
  • relatively few features and services are included;
  • not focused on enterprises;
  • not such a wide feature range as in AWS.

Amazon Web Services: Pros and Cons

If you are selecting this provider, the benefits you’ll receive include:

  • simple app development process;
  • updating an app to a newer version in a short time;
  • providing powerful computing;
  • enhanced productivity of app dev team;
  • payments only for services you use with no long-lasting agreements and payments in advance;
  • quick and unlimited virtual cloud accessing;
  • perfect if your team can set up and handle the infrastructure;
  • comprehensive training;
  • offering automated features;
  • support for big corporations;
  • global reach due to worldwide data centers;
  • enables using the already well-known models, data storage, systems, and app architectures;

Its disadvantages include:

  • in some instances, the app publishing process can be time-consuming, complicated;
  • error description not included;
  • not the ideal variant for start-up projects with inexperienced teams;
  • overwhelmed with functionality;
  • the price system is not as well-developed as in GCS;
  • you should handle the app launch manually, as it isn’t automated;
  • in case you launch many applications at the same time, it can become a tricky process.

Which is more suitable?

Honestly, there is no unambiguous winner in the competition, as each provider has its good points and bad points. AWS is a perfect option for large multinational enterprises that are operating in numerous countries. They aim to gain global reach, excellent support levels, accessibility, and enhanced profits.

On the contrary, Google Cloud involves better on-demand prices, flexibility, and high speed. It corresponds to the requirements of most enterprises. It’s not obligatory to select only one platform. You may get the most usage of both of them by resorting to a multi-cloud strategy. This way, you may develop an environment that perfectly matches all of your business requirements for the most efficient prices. 

Founder, editor, and contributor at Technosoups. He is a veteran tech blogger with a passion for Smartwatches and Smartphones. He is very much keen on the future technology and the future gadgets! He spends most of his money on getting the latest and greatest gadgets. Follow him on Social Channels: